John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Gary Wheelock, Lieutenant

Good Law
42 F.3d 1399·1994 WL 659060·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199494-35347California690 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1399 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Robert DEMOS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary WHEELOCK, Lieutenant, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35347. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 2 1 John Robert Demos, Jr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in Demos's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. Demos alleged that defendants violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches by subjecting him to a digital rectal search. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 2 Demos contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment because there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants Haverman and Paulino subjected him to a digital rectal search. Demos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.