Juarez v. I.N.S.

42 F.3d 1400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfonso Rutilio JUAREZ; Azyadee Orgonez De Juarez; Alfonso Rutilio Juarez, Jr.; Emilio Antonio Juarez; Erick Antonio Juarez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70373. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 3, 1994. * Decided Nov. 17, 1994. Before: CANBY, LEAVY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Alfonso Juarez 1 (Juarez) appeals the BIA's denial of his request for asylum or withholding of deportation. He also argues that the BIA violated his due process rights by taking administrative notice of the changed conditions in Nicaragua without giving him notice. We deny the petition for review. DISCUSSION A. Denial of Asylum 3 The immigration judge (IJ) held that Juarez failed to present objective evidence to support his assertion that he has a well-founded fear of persecution. Juarez challenges this conclusion and offers three…