Jacqueline Jenkins v. State Farm Insurance Cos.

Good Law
42 F.3d 1400·1994 WL 678542·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39476
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 199493-16134California2,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jacqueline JENKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COS., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. Decided Dec. 2, 1994. Before: CHOY, FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Jacqueline Jenkins ("Jenkins") challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment on her handicap discrimination claim under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("CFEHA"), Cal. Gov't Code Sec. 12900 et seq. Further, Jenkins appeals several interlocutory orders, including (1) the district court's dismissal of her claim for breach of an implied-in-fact contract not to terminate except for good cause; (2) the district court's subsequent denial of a motion for leave to amend the complaint; and (3) the district court's grant of State Farm's motion to strike Jenkins' request for punitive damages under CFEHA. Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.