David E. Jirovec v. James Blodgett, and O. Patton C/o Belanger--C/o Younger C/o Skramstad C/o Keithley

42 F.3d 1400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David E. JIROVEC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James BLODGETT, Defendant, and O. Patton; C/O Belanger;--C/O Younger; C/O Skramstad; C/O Keithley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35279. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David E. Jirovec, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Jirovec contends that his constitutional rights were violated when prison guards retaliated against him for filing a prior court action by conducting three cell searches. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 241-42 (9th Cir.1989), and affirm. 3 "Summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party presents evidence that shows that no genuine issue of…