Robert L. Hubbard v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle

42 F.3d 1400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert L. HUBBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35107. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Hubbard appeals pro se the district court's dismissal his action as time barred. 1 Hubbard alleged that his former employer, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle ("METRO") discriminated against him on the basis of his race and disability in violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 , and Washington Revised Code section 49.60. Hubbard also alleged that METRO breached its settlement agreement with him when METRO terminated him as a transit operator. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Gerritsen v. Consulado General de Mexico, 989 F.2d 340, 343 (9th…