Kouchek Javidi v. Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Inc. Dameron Hospital Rameo Puzon Luis Arismendi
Opinion
Opinion
42 F.3d 1400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kouchek JAVIDI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; Dameron Hospital; Rameo Puzon; Luis Arismendi, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17192. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 16, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kouchek Javidi appeals pro se the district court's denial of her motion for appointment of counsel in her action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e to 2000e-17, and of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. Secs. 621-34 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . 1 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's decision on a motion for appointment of counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-5(f)(1)(B), Bradshaw v. Zoological Soc'y of San Diego, 662 F.2d 1301, 1319 (9th Cir.1981), and…