Kumar v. National Medical Enterprises, Inc.

42 F.3d 1400 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,868 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Narendra KUMAR, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, INC.; Scenic Faculty Medical Group; William L. Boddie, M.D.; Martin S. Cohen, M.D.; Ronald Goldman, M.D.; Maynard Rasmussen; M.D.; Robert Watson, M.D.; and Richard Gratian, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16841. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Narendra Kumar, M.D., appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his action alleging violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Secs. 1 and 2, and state law in relation to his loss of staff privileges at two hospitals. Kumar contends that the district court erred by (1) finding Kumar failed to establish a question of material fact regarding the existence of antitrust injury, (2) refusing to grant…