Larry D. Robinson v. State of Arizona Maricopa County

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry D. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Maricopa County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15325. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry D. Robinson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Reebok Int'l Ltd. v. Marnatech Enter. Inc., 970 F.2d 552 , 554 (9th Cir.1992), and affirm. 3 In his complaint, Robinson alleges that Arizona's mandatory vehicle insurance law, its vehicle registration law and its law imposing sanctions for driving a non-registered vehicle are unconstitutional. As part of the relief requested, Robinson seeks to have all traffic charges against him dismissed. 4 Attached to Robinson's…