Karluk Mayweathers v. William Bunnell, Superintendent of Tehachapi State Prison

Good Law
42 F.3d 1401·1994 WL 615708·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39493
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 199493-17002California1,010 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Karluk MAYWEATHERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William BUNNELL, Superintendent of Tehachapi State Prison, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17002. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Karluk Mayweathers, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action against William Bunnell, Correctional Officer Jones and Correctional Officer Skerik 1 because Mayweathers failed to file a status report. Mayweathers also challenges the district court's change of venue under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1404 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 2 3 * Dismissal 4 Mayweathers contends that the district court erred by dismissing his action for failure to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.