In Re Rodney Rummelsburg, Aka: Ronny Rummelsburg, Debtor, Rodney Rummelsburg, Aka: Ronny Rummelsburg v. Amtec Systems Corporation

Good Law
42 F.3d 1401·1994 WL 615759·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39489
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 199493-56387California755 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Rodney RUMMELSBURG, aka: Ronny Rummelsburg, Debtor, Rodney RUMMELSBURG, aka: Ronny Rummelsburg, Appellant, v. AMTEC SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 93-56387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodney Rummelsburg appeals pro se the district court's affirmance of summary judgment granted by the bankruptcy court. Rummelsburg contends these courts erred by applying collateral estoppel to hold his liability for a California state judgment nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 523 (a)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and affirm. 3 Section 523(a)(6) bars discharge of debts "for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity." Intentionally injuring property constitutes a "willful and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.