Nancy Ann Ruff, and B. Benedict Waters v. Charles Young, Norman Eugene Wright, Paul P. Townsend, Fred Takemiya, Wanda Soukup, Don Smith, Susan Von Seeburg, Sandra Rich, Hagenbaugh & Murphy, Meredith A. Musicant Gail Cowling, William Cormier, Barbara Corona-Sutton, Peter Blackman, Charles Oakley, John Sicard, and Herman Tiano

Good Law
42 F.3d 1401·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199419-71602California329 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nancy Ann RUFF, Plaintiff, and B. Benedict Waters, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles YOUNG, Norman Eugene Wright, Paul P. Townsend, Fred Takemiya, Wanda Soukup, Don Smith, Susan Von Seeburg, Sandra Rich, Hagenbaugh & Murphy, Meredith A. Musicant Gail Cowling, William Cormier, Barbara Corona-Sutton, Peter Blackman, Charles Oakley, John Sicard, and Herman Tiano, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55193. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 B. Benedict Waters seeks review of the district court's (1) December 21, 1993 partial summary judgment against Waters on Nancy Ann Ruff and Water's fourth claim for relief, and (2) January 11, 1994 order denying Waters' motion to alter or amend the December 21, 1993 partial summary judgment. The district court's December 21 partial summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.