Elizabeth Quintana v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
42 F.3d 1401·1994 WL 669483·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39504
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 199493-70407California1,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elizabeth QUINTANA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1994. Decided Nov. 30, 1994. Before: CANBY, LEAVY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * I. 2 Elizabeth Quintana, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the BIA's dismissal of her appeal from the deportability finding of the immigration judge ("IJ"). She argues that her admission of foreign birth and date of entry into the United States should have been suppressed as fruits of an egregious, illegal arrest. We deny the petition for review. II. 3 Quintana argues that the information in the Order to Show Cause ("OSC") and the admission of foreign birth she made at her deportation hearing should be suppressed under the exclusionary rule as evidence stemming from an illegal arrest made in egregious…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.