Jorge L. Ortiz v. County of Orange M. Arellano M. Mech Rose Mary Reyes-Hatch

42 F.3d 1401 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jorge L. ORTIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE; M. Arellano; M. Mech; Rose Mary Reyes-Hatch, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 19, 1994. * Decided Nov. 28, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jorge L. Ortiz, a Mexican-American resident of Orange County, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). 3 * On January 7, 1994, Jorge Ortiz lodged a complaint in the federal district court for the Central District of California alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Ortiz named as defendants Orange County, and M. Arellano, M. Mech, and Rose Mary Reyes-Hatch, all alleged employees of Orange County. In addition, on January 7, 1994, Ortiz submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 4 On January 19, 1994, the…