Florentino Reyes Santana v. Paul J. Schriner, Deputy Warden Attorney General

Good Law
42 F.3d 1402·1994 WL 461667·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39515
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 199493-15360California2,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1402 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Florentino Reyes SANTANA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Paul J. SCHRINER, Deputy Warden; Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-15360. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1994. * Filed May 18, 1994. Memoranda Withdrawn Aug. 25, 1994. Aug. 25, 1994. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed on 18 May 1994, in this matter is withdrawn. The attached memorandum disposition is hereby issued in its place. The petition for rehearing is denied. Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Florentino Reyes Santana appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court found that Santana had procedurally defaulted his claims and had failed to demonstrate cause for his default. Santana contends that the district court erroneously found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.