Columbus Sanders v. Los Angeles Unified School District Ed Sams Tony Rivas, Supervisor United Teachers Los Angeles, Columbus Sanders v. Los Angeles Board of Education, Los Angeles Unified School District Dr. Tony Rivas Dr. Ed Sams United Teachers Los Angeles, United Teachers Los Angeles Grievance Resolution Committee United Teachers Los Angeles Board of Directors

Good Law
42 F.3d 1402·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 199493-55397California1,028 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1402 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Columbus SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Ed Sams; Tony Rivas, Supervisor; United Teachers Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellees. Columbus SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES BOARD OF EDUCATION, Los Angeles Unified School District; Dr. Tony Rivas; Dr. Ed Sams; United Teachers Los Angeles, United Teachers Los Angeles Grievance Resolution Committee; United Teachers Los Angeles Board of Directors, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-55397, 93-55569. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 4, 1994. * Decided Nov. 21, 1994. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 In this consolidated appeal, Columbus Sanders challenges pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Los Angeles Unified School District ("LAUSD"), United Teachers Los Angeles ("UTLA"), and others (No. 93-55397), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.