Samuel Song v. Bob Miller

Good Law
42 F.3d 1402·1994 WL 651926·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199493-16790California1,622 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1402 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel SONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bob MILLER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16790. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 18, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Song, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment and default judgment in favor of numerous state prison officials and the district court's denial of his discovery motion in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Song contends that (1) the district court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of prison officials on his due process violation claim on the grounds of qualified immunity; (2) the district court erred in granting default judgment on prison officials' counterclaim for money owed by him to the Nevada Department of Prisons; (3) the district court abused its discretion by staying his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.