United States v. Cesar Flores-Lomeli

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar FLORES-LOMELI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 3, 1994. Decided Dec. 7, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, FERNANDEZ Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Cesar Flores-Lomeli appeals his conviction following his entrance of a guilty plea for illegal reentry into the United States after conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (a), b(1), and b(2). He seeks reversal of the district court's refusal to vacate his guilty plea, claiming that he was not fully advised of possible defenses available to him. He claims the "found in the United States" language of the statute is unconstitutionally vague and that his prior state convictions for distribution of marijuana do not constitute "aggravated felonies." We affirm. 4 The district court had…