United States v. Baldomero Guzman-Quintero

Good Law
42 F.3d 1403·1994 WL 651931·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39576
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199492-50550California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Baldomero GUZMAN-QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50550. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 18, 1994. 1 Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge; GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Baldomero Guzman-Quintero appeals his conviction following entry of a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 846 , 841(a)(1), and use of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). Guzman-Quintero contends his conviction should be reversed because the district court accepted his guilty plea without determining that he understood the constitutional rights he was waiving by pleading guilty, as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(c)(3). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.