United States v. Jerry Paul Lillard

Good Law
42 F.3d 1403·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39591
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 199419-16487California1,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Paul LILLARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35155. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jerry Paul Lillard appeals pro se the denial of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . Lillard, who is serving a 255-month sentence for manufacturing methamphetamine and possessing an unregistered firearm, challenges the validity of his conditional guilty plea and his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 and review de novo. See United States v. Roberts, 5 F.3d 365, 368 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm. 3 Lillard states that he was denied access to a police report, which indicated that the police had destroyed the chemicals found in his two laboratories without weighing them. The precise legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.