United States v. Kim Annon Bishop, United States of America v. Elio Manuel Azevedo
Opinion
Opinion
42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kim Annon BISHOP, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elio Manuel AZEVEDO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10529, 93-10554. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. * Decided Dec. 5, 1994. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CR-92-05241-EDP; Edward D. Price, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Cal. APPEAL DISMISSED. Before: FARRIS, BOOCHEVER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bishop appeals his sentence for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and a separate count of conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. Azevedo challenges his sentence on the ground that he suffered ineffective assistance of counsel at his sentencing on similar charges. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We dismiss Azevedo's appeal and…