United States v. Eufemio Perez, A/K/A Diego Ceballos

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eufemio PEREZ, a/k/a Diego Ceballos, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50717. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 20, 1994. * Decided Nov. 15, 1994. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eufemio Perez pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 , preserving his right to appeal the district court's denial of his motions to suppress. On appeal, he contends that the district court erred in concluding that police had probable cause to search and arrest. We reject his contentions, and we affirm. 3 The district court concluded that Perez lacked standing to challenge the search and, alternatively, that there existed probable cause to justify the search. We need not decide whether Perez lacked standing. We have already held in the separate appeal by Perez's…