United States v. Manuel Ontiveros-Sanchez

Good Law
42 F.3d 1403·1994 WL 651920·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39575
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 199494-10196California1,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel ONTIVEROS-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 18, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Manuel Ontiveros-Sanchez appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 (a)(1). Ontiveros-Sanchez contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) the district court's judicial misconduct materially affected the outcome of his trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 * Sufficiency of the Evidence 4 Ontiveros-Sanchez contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove that he knowingly possessed marijuana with intent to distribute. Specifically, Ontiveros-Sanchez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.