United States v. Rogelio Sanchez Carranza

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio Sanchez CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50276. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 11, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rogelio Sanchez Carranza appeals his conviction following a jury trial for possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 841 , and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 . Carranza contends that: (1) the district court erred by admitting evidence of his involvement in a prior drug transaction; and (2) that his convictions for both conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute heroin violate Wharton's Rule. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 * Prior Bad Acts 4 Carranza contends that the district court erred by admitting into…