United States v. William Elrod, Jr.

42 F.3d 1403 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William ELROD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10051. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Elrod, Jr., appeals the district court's order revoking his probation. Elrod first contends that his probationary term expired before he committed the acts supporting the revocation, therefore, the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his probation. Second, Elrod argues that the district court erred by failing to order a study of his psychological condition before imposing sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 * District Court's Jurisdiction to Revoke Probation 4 On January 5, 1984, Judge Vukasin sentenced Elrod on two charges of unarmed bank robbery--one charge had originated in the…