United States v. Ronald Clinton Schneider

42 F.3d 1404 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Clinton SCHNEIDER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30430. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Dec. 6, 1994. 1 Before: FLETCHER, D.W. NELSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ronald Clinton Schneider appeals his 51-month sentence for unarmed bank robbery charged under 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 2113(a). We have jurisdiction and affirm. I. Facts 4 Schneider challenges the district court's refusal to apply either a four-level adjustment for playing a minimal role in the offense under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2(a) or a two-level adjustment for playing a minor role under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2(b). Schneider argues that his conduct should be compared to that of his co-participant in the robbery, Randy Nutting. Nutting eventually admitted to committing five robberies on his own in addition to the one in which Schneider…