United States v. Warren Bruce Steffen
Opinion
Opinion
42 F.3d 1404 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Warren Bruce STEFFEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10019. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 22, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Warren Bruce Steffen challenges the jurisdiction of the district court to revoke his probation. We review de novo the district court's jurisdiction. United States v. Jones, 852 F.2d 1235, 1237 (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Levitt, 799 F.2d 505, 506 (9th Cir.1986). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 In May 1987, Steffen was indicted on eight counts of wire fraud. The offenses occurred between May 1983 and April 1984, prior to the effective date of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Following entry of a guilty plea to counts 1, 4, and 6 of the indictment, the district court imposed four-year consecutive…