United States v. Rohitesh Prasad

42 F.3d 1404 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rohitesh PRASAD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30149. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 14, 1994. * Decided Nov. 18, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rohitesh Prasad appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of a mixture and substance containing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 846 ; two counts of structuring a financial transaction in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 5322 , 5342(e); and seven counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956 (a)(1)(B)(ii). He contends resentencing is required because the district court: (1) failed to order that his sentence run concurrently with a sentence previously imposed by the Central District of California as required by U.S.S.G. Sec. 5G1.3(b); and (2) failed to…