Andrew G. Yartzoff v. William K. Reilly

42 F.3d 1405 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andrew G. YARTZOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William K. REILLY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16927. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 4, 1994. * Decided Oct. 11, 1994. Before: BROWNING, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andrew Yartzoff appeals pro se from the district court's final judgment in favor of his former employer, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), and other defendants in his action brought under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e, alleging violations of due process and retaliation for engaging in protected activities. Yartzoff contends that the district court erred by (1) dismissing Merit Systems Protection Board ("MSPB") members as defendants, (2) striking his request for a jury trial, (3) denying his request to add a claim for compensatory damages to the retaliation claim, (4) and finding that he failed to rebut the EPA's evidence of a…