United States v. Edmond

Good Law
43 F.3d 472·94 Daily Journal DAR 18251·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36505·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9801
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 199493-10543California1,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 472 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ramon EDMOND, aka Looney; Calvin Springer, aka Cat, aka Cardell Starr; Alondras Saunders, aka C-Nut, aka Lon; and Joseph Dion Hill, aka J.D., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-10543. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1994. Decided Dec. 29, 1994. Joseph Douglas Wilson, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for plaintiff-appellant. Mark B. Bailus and Catherine Ann Woolf, Cherry, Bailus & Kelesis, Daniel J. Albreghts, Theodore J. Manos, Manos & Associates, Lamond R. Mills, Las Vegas, NV, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and VAN SICKLE, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge LEAVY; Concurrence by Judge VAN SICKLE. LEAVY, Circuit Judge: 1 The government appeals the district court's order granting a new trial based on juror misconduct. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3731 , and we reverse. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 2 Alondras Saunders, Ramon Edmond, Calvin Springer, and Joseph Dion Hill were charged with several counts stemming from an armed bank robbery. During…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.