United States v. Edward Darnell Fondren

Good Law
43 F.3d 1228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 199493-50470California722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tanner, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed on August 12, 1994 is hereby amended by deleting the fourth full paragraph at 32 F.3d 429, 430 (9th Cir.1994) and by replacing it with the following paragraph including footnote 1: Editor’s Note: Changes incorporated for purposes of publication.

OPINION

Edward Darnell Fondren appeals his sentence after a conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). He was sentenced to the mandatory minimum of fifteen (15) years under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal and AFFIRM.

Fondren raises only one issue on appeal. He challenges the validity of a 1985 California state conviction for robbery. The robbery conviction was used as a predicate felony to qualify Fondren for ACCA status. He alleges that his guilty plea in that case was not voluntary because he was erroneously informed about, and relied upon, his eligibility for Youth Authority placement, and that he was not completely informed about his rights to a jury trial and, therefore, did not voluntarily waive those rights. The district court considered Fondren’s arguments and rejected them, holding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.