Barajas v. Bermudez

Good Law
43 F.3d 1251·94 Daily Journal DAR 18079·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36145·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9695
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 199492-17030California5,942 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 1251 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,188 Ubaldo BARAJAS, Tito Peneda Davila, Alberto Media, and Ramon Murillo, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elias BERMUDEZ and Dora Bermudez; Natalia Medina; Jesus Jose Bermudez, Marcos J. Flores, husband, Enriqueta Bermudez Flores, wife and Albert S. Medina; Centro de Progreso, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-17030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1994. Decided Dec. 23, 1994. David Alan Dick, Larry Ruhl, and Hannah E.M. Lieberman, Community Legal Services, Inc., Tolleson, AZ, for plaintiffs-appellants. Elias Bermudez, Natalia Medina, Jesus Jose Bermudez, Centro de Progreso, pro se and for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before: D.W. NELSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and LETTS, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge D.W. NELSON; Dissent by Judge BEEZER. D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs, seasonal agricultural workers, appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint, which alleges violations of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1801 et seq.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.