Mustafa Ansari v. Charles Plummer

43 F.3d 1478 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mustafa ANSARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles PLUMMER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15759. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 9, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mustafa Ansari, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's (1) summary judgment in favor of Sheriff Charles Plummer in Ansari's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action seeking an injunction requiring Santa Rita Jail to provide prisoners with a constitutionally adequate prison law library, and (2) denial of his motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We vacate and remand the district court's summary judgment order, and affirm the district court's denial of Ansari's motion for leave to file an amended complaint. 3 * Summary Judgment 4 In his complaint, Ansari alleged that the Santa Rita Jail…