Michael Bueing v. Arthur Wallenstein, Director, King County Jail

43 F.3d 1478 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael BUEING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arthur WALLENSTEIN, Director, King County Jail, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35400. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Michael Bueing appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction of unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to manufacture or deliver. Bueing contends that his rights to a fair trial and confrontation were violated when the jury engaged in out-of-court experiments to corroborate his testimony. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We review de novo, Hendricks v. Zenon, 993 F.2d 664, 668 (9th Cir.1993), and affirm. 3 "In conducting their deliberations, jurors have a duty to consider only the evidence which is presented to them in…