Ray Dobard v. The United States District Court for Northern California

43 F.3d 1478 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ray DOBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17125. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 1, 1994. * Decided Nov. 4, 1994. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Dobard appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, two district court judges, the clerk of the court, and several deputy clerks. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Dobard brought this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 1 403 U.S. 388 (1971), alleging that his equal protection rights were violated because he was denied equal access to the courts based on two pre-filing review orders regarding Dobard and his treatment…