Freeman v. Parks

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. George FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Wes PARKS, Defendant, Lester Lester "Chuck" Dalrymple; Paula O'Connor; Mike Murphy; Jack Rabourn; John Doe, Officers of the State of Washington 1 thru 5, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35578. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 9, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Freeman appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Freeman's civil rights action against members and employees of the Washington state liquor control board. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo whether a genuine issue of material fact precludes summary judgment and whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. E.g., Tipton v. University of Haw., 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994). We affirm. 3 This action is another in a long series of federal…