Scott A. McMillan v. Rudy Camacho, District Director of Customs

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Scott A. McMILLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rudy CAMACHO, District Director of Customs, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55760. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 8, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: FARRIS, POOLE, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Scott A. McMillan appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction requiring the United States Customs Service (Customs Service) to follow certain oversight procedures whenever it conducts a border search of McMillan, his family or his employers. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 1 3 * Preliminary Injunction 4 McMillan contends the district court erred by concluding that he failed to show the possibility of irreparable harm. We reject the argument. 5 A district court's denial of a preliminary injunction is subject to a limited review. Miller v. California…