John M. Ross v. United States of America Thomas D. Elliott Joel C. Estes Kevin J. Hoyt Bernard M. Hansen

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John M. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Thomas D. Elliott; Joel C. Estes; Kevin J. Hoyt; Bernard M. Hansen, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55559. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 9, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. *** 1 MEMORANDUM **** 2 John M. Ross appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his complaint against the United States and alleged government employees and denying leave to file the same action as well as another lawsuit against certain private individuals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 Ross is subject to two injunctions entered by the district court for the Southern District of California after he filed frivolous and vexatious lawsuits challenging certain bankruptcy decisions. The injunctions require Ross to seek the court's leave before filing any action…