Magdy Kamel Makar v. Avnet, Inc. Hamilton/avnet Electronics of Arizona, Inc. Hamilton/avnet Electronics of Missouri Hamilton/avnet Electronics of San Diego

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Magdy Kamel MAKAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AVNET, INC.; Hamilton/Avnet Electronics of Arizona, Inc.; Hamilton/Avnet Electronics of Missouri; Hamilton/Avnet Electronics of San Diego, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56146. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 7, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: FARRIS, POOLE, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiff Magdy Makar appeals the district court's summary judgment on various state law claims arising out of his termination by Avnet, Inc. Reviewing the district court's summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we affirm. 3 In order to state a claim for breach of an implied contract or breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Makar must rebut the statutory presumption that he was an at-will employee. Knights v. Hewlett Packard, 230 Cal.App.3d 775,…