Walter David Morgan v. F.T. MacDonald White Pine County School Board R. Angelone George Deeds S. Godinez C. Wolff W. Reid

Good Law
43 F.3d 1479·1994 WL 691730·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39872
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 199492-16643California476 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Walter David MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F.T. MacDONALD; White Pine County School Board; R. Angelone; George Deeds; S. Godinez; C. Wolff; W. Reid, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16643. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred Sept. 12, 1994. Submitted Sept. 16, 1994. Decided Dec. 2, 1994. Before: FEINBERG, * SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Morgan's appointed counsel raised two issues in the supplemental brief he submitted, which we've addressed in a separate published opinion. We now address the remaining five issues plaintiff has raised in his pro se brief. 3 1. Morgan's ineligibility for minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) doesn't violate equal protection. The primary goal of the FLSA is to ensure a minimum standard of living for workers; Congress hardly acted irrationally in excluding individuals for whom food, shelter and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.