Lawanda A. Johnson v. United Teachers Los Angeles United Teachers Los Angeles Election Committee Leo Bayer Leo Cotter

Good Law
43 F.3d 1479·1994 WL 703042·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39893
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 199494-55138California1,029 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LaWanda A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES; United Teachers Los Angeles Election Committee; Leo Bayer; Leo Cotter, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55138. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 LaWanda A. Johnson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1981 action alleging race discrimination. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo, Tipton v. University of Haw., 15 F.3d 922 , 925 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, we must determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court applied the correct substantive law. Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339-40…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.