F. Farah Etemad v. State of California, Department of Toxic Substance Control (Dtsc)

Good Law
43 F.3d 1479·1994 WL 477717·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39869
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 199493-55385California2,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 1479 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. F. Farah ETEMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE CONTROL (DTSC), Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55385. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 5, 1994. * Memorandum Filed April 11, 1994. Order Withdrawing Prior Memorandum Sept. 2, 1994. Decided Sept. 2, 1994. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed April 11, 1994, is hereby withdrawn. Before: POOLE, BEEZER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 F. Farah Etemad appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her second amended complaint against the State of California, Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") alleging various claims arising from her discharge from employment. Etemad contends the district court erred by vacating default judgments entered against DTSC and by dismissing her complaint without leave to amend. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.