United States v. Carlos Munoz

43 F.3d 1480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Carlos MUNOZ, Defendant/Appellant. No. 93-50490. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: BROWNING, ALDISERT * and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This is an appeal from the conviction of Carlos Munoz for attempted bank robbery, conspiracy to commit bank robbery, and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. Munoz raised five issues on appeal, three of which have already been addressed by us in the appeal of Munoz's co-defendants, Trina Devay Harper and Aziz Sharrieff, United States v. Harper, 33 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir.1994). 3 Jurisdiction was proper in the trial court based on 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3231 . This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Appeal was timely filed under Rule 4(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 4 To the extent Munoz challenges the trial…