United States v. Richard K. Ludden, II

43 F.3d 1480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard K. LUDDEN, II, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard K. Ludden, II appeals the district court's revocation of his supervised release and imposition of a two-year sentence of imprisonment following his admission that he had violated two conditions of his release. Ludden contends that the district court violated his due process rights by failing to advise him of the possible consequences of his admissions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review issues of law de novo. United States v. McConney, 728 F.2d 1195, 1201 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 (1984). 4 A defendant charged with a probation violation is entitled to notice of the violations,…