United States v. Senon Grande Grajeda

43 F.3d 1480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Senon Grande GRAJEDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50180. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Senon Grande Grajeda appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). Grajeda contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 3 Grajeda contends that the government failed to present sufficient evidence at trial to prove that he threw the firearm out of his car window after a police officer motioned for him to pull over. This contention lacks merit. 4 Because Grajeda failed to renew his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal pursuant to Rule 29 at the close of all the evidence, we…