United States v. Ronald J. Dupard

43 F.3d 1480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald J. DUPARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35510. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rejection of Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc April 13, 1995. Before: D.W. NELSON, HALL and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald J. Dupard, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion challenging his pre-Sentencing Reform Act conviction and sentence following entry of a guilty plea to various narcotics offenses. Dupard contends that the government is in breach of his plea agreement and that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea as a remedy for this breach. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm. A. Background 3 As part of the negotiated plea…