United States v. Real Property Located at 25445 Via Dona Christa, Valencia, California

Good Law
43 F.3d 1480
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 19941480California903 words

Opinion

Opinion

43 F.3d 1480 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 25445 VIA DONA CHRISTA, VALENCIA, CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Ramdas P. Gupta, Claimant-Appellant. No. 93-55797. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 9, 1994. * Decided Dec. 14, 1994. Before: FLETCHER, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramdas P. Gupta appeals pro se the forfeiture of his house under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 881 (a)(7) following his stipulation that authorities seized narcotics and related paraphernalia from the premises on five separate occasions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm in part and remand in part. 3 Gupta argues first that the district judge showed bias against him. We reject this claim because Gupta has not alleged any fact indicating bias. 4 Gupta also argues in his reply brief that the seizure of his home violated due process because there was no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.