Fechter v. Shiroky
44 F.3d 835·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4247·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1677
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 199594-16047California108 words
Opinion
44 F.3d 835 Victoria FECHTER; Thor Fechter; Tordis Fechter; Harry R. Fechter, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jana SHIROKY, Defendant, and Diane S. Goebel; Bonnie Supin; Marcie Cherek; Dawn Hardy; State of Nevada; Dan Bixler; Fred Fisher; David Dunn; Cheryl Levin; Laurel Swetnam; Jerry Carlin, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16047. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 6, 1995. Before: SNEED, D.W. NELSON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 On the court's own motion, the mandate is recalled. In addition, the court withdraws both the per curiam opinion and memorandum disposition, filed concurrently on January 13, 1995, and vacates the submission. This case will be recalendared as soon as practicable.