Elisio Cisneros-Ledesma v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elisio CISNEROS-LEDESMA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. * Decided Dec. 28, 1994. Before: LAY, ** PREGERSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Petitioner Eliseo Cisneros-Ledesma appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals' Order which found him deportable under Sec. 241(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 (a)(1). He was found deportable as an intended immigrant in possession of neither a valid visa under Sec. 212(a)(20) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a)(20), nor a labor certificate under Sec. 212(a)(14) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (a)(14). We have jurisdiction under Sec. 106(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a). We vacate the Board's order and remand. I. BACKGROUND 3 Cisneros is a native and citizen of Mexico. Cisneros was married in the United…