Vincent Cali, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Gary A. Rosenberg

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vincent CALI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary A. ROSENBERG, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15862. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. Decided Dec. 29, 1994. 1 Before: ALARCON, HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge, * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Appellants Vincent Cali, Howard Kichler and George and Juanita Proechel ("Plaintiffs") appeal from the district court's dismissal of their consolidated actions for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 1 The three actions had substantially similar complaints, thus the parties and the district court referred to the complaints as "the Complaint." 4 The Complaint alleges that Defendants UDC, its general partners, and the officers and directors of the general partners, including Defendant Rosenberg, ("UDC") violated Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities…