Ronni Craig v. Compagnie Nationale Air France

Good Law
45 F.3d 435·1994 WL 711916·1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40266
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 21, 199493-55263California1,665 words

Opinion

Opinion

45 F.3d 435 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronni CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPAGNIE NATIONALE AIR FRANCE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1994. * Decided Dec. 21, 1994. 1 Before: FEINBERG, ** SCHROEDER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Plaintiff Ronni Craig appeals from a December 1992 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, granting defendant Compagnie Nationale Air France (Air France) summary judgment in plaintiff's suit for damages based on an injury she suffered aboard an Air France international flight in May 1990. For reasons given below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. I. Facts and Prior Proceedings 4 Plaintiff injured herself while en route from Los Angeles to Paris. At the time, she was attempting to return to her seat, the middle seat in a row of three, without awakening her neighbor in the aisle seat.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.